<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GS2LAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gs2law.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gs2law.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Constitutionality of a Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/the-constitutionality-of-a-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/the-constitutionality-of-a-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog generally covers issues of intellectual property—one of the strengths of Garson, Segal, Steinmetz, Fladgate. But this week, we take a slight detour as the Supreme Court hears arguments in a really interesting question at the intersection of First Amendment and information law: Can Congress criminalize a lie? In United States vs. Alvarez, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/the-constitutionality-of-a-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot News to Meltwater</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/hot_news_to_meltwater/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/hot_news_to_meltwater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A battle is brewing in the media world. The protagonist is an established news organization, and the antagonist is an ambitious young Internet company. Oh wait, you’ve heard this one before? As even casual observers of the media industry know, this is not exactly a novel type of conflict. Ever since the rise of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/hot_news_to_meltwater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are First Sales Final?</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/are-first-sales-final/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/are-first-sales-final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re in the business of software creation and distribution, a current California case is worth paying attention to. In Adobe Systems Inc. v. Hoops Enterprise LLC, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held on February 1, 2012 that Adobe’s distribution of certain software to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) was a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/are-first-sales-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Blockbuster Case</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/the-blockbuster-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/the-blockbuster-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Supreme Court term is filled with blockbuster cases. What is a “blockbuster” case, you might ask? It’s a case of such significance, where the conflicting interests are so clearly articulated and the outcome so uncertain, that the general public actually begins to pay attention. Sure, every case the High Court touches really matters. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/the-blockbuster-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some More on SOPA</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/some-more-on-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/some-more-on-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, as the Internet world was still reeling from the SOPA and PIPA controversies, the Department of Justice (DOJ) was busy enforcing existing copyright infringement laws. On Thursday, January 19, the government shutdown Megaupload, the massive file-sharing website. The site was one of the most popular on the web, receiving some 50 million unique [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/some-more-on-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiter! There&#8217;s A Fly In My SOPA</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/waiter-theres-a-fly-in-my-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/waiter-theres-a-fly-in-my-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people believe that intellectual property is an arcane subject, relevant only to stodgy lawyers and judges. Apart from the occasional public controversies around Napster in 2001 and the scandal over the Mike Tyson tattoo in the Hangover II movie, IP is a field that mostly stays out of the public spotlight. That changed on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/waiter-theres-a-fly-in-my-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching Football (Soccer) in Europe Is Greek to Me</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/watching-football-soccer-in-europe-is-greek-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/watching-football-soccer-in-europe-is-greek-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the UK, the Football Association Premier League Ltd (FAPL) markets TV broadcasting rights for the EPL and grants exclusive live broadcasting rights for territory, under an open competitive tender procedure. As a result of global reception each broadcaster is mandated to encrypt its signal so viewers can only watch the broadcast of their territorial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/watching-football-soccer-in-europe-is-greek-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satellite Radio: A “Sirius” Threat to Artists’ Body and Soul?</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/satellite-radio-a-%e2%80%9csirius%e2%80%9d-threat-to-artists%e2%80%99-body-and-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/satellite-radio-a-%e2%80%9csirius%e2%80%9d-threat-to-artists%e2%80%99-body-and-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music Artists are facing a new threat to their royalty income, as satellite broadcaster Sirius/XM is seeking to bypass the standard system of paying royalties. If such bypass was granted, artists and producers would suffer substantial losses, as the value of performance royalties would be lowered, potentially creating unnecessary conflict between artists and their labels. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/satellite-radio-a-%e2%80%9csirius%e2%80%9d-threat-to-artists%e2%80%99-body-and-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small businesses: How to raise money without going public?</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/small-businesses-how-to-raise-money-without-going-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/small-businesses-how-to-raise-money-without-going-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small businesses often face financial difficulties, due to a lack of capital. Developing a new project can indeed be costly, and banks can be reluctant to provide funding to small business owners. A good alternative to raise capital is to sell shares or “securities” of the company to external investors. However, offering securities to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/small-businesses-how-to-raise-money-without-going-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Were you worth it? L&#8217;Oréal v eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.gs2law.com/were-you-worth-it-loreal-v-ebay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gs2law.com/were-you-worth-it-loreal-v-ebay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GS2LAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gs2law.com/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe decided with quintessential clarity&#8230; We are still confused. A European judgment has been given which is going to cause cyber ripples throughout the matrix with the ECJ ruling against eBay for permitting and promoting sales of L&#8217;Oréal product without L&#8217;Oréal’s consent. Two years ago in [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch) Arnold J. sitting in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gs2law.com/were-you-worth-it-loreal-v-ebay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

